|
|
Issue 5, 2007
HOT TOPICS IN CARDIOLOGY
Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events: the state of the art
| Publ. date: | 2007 |
| ISBN: | 978-88-89881-24-8 |
| ISSN: | 1973-9621 |
| E-ISSN: | 2036-0924 |
| DOI: | 10.4147/HTC-070500 |
Abstract
Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent innovation in the last 50 years of antihypertensive drug development. The first compound of this new drug class, losartan, was launched in 1995 for treatment of hypertension, and several other ARBs followed. From a pharmacological point of view, ARBs inhibit - as do the already very succesfully used angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors - one of the most important cardiovascular regulatory systems: the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). In contrast to the ACE inhibitors, ARBs act more specifically by selectively blocking the angiotensin AT1 receptor (AT1R) without affecting their counterpart, angiotensin AT2 receptor (AT2R). While most of the negative cardiovascular actions of angiotensin II appear to be mediated through AT1R, and while AT2R has largely beneficial effects under certain pathophysiological conditions, it is possible that ARBs provide additional end-organ protection in comparison to ACE inhibitors. Since the introduction of ARBs to the market, more than 10 years of clinical usage and excessive clinical trials recruiting more than 100,000 patients have passed. ARBs have proved to successfully reduce blood pressure and to be extremely well tolerated. Several trials have been performed that indicate the superiority of ARBs when compared to other drug classes with respect to blood pressure control, end-organ damage, and cardiovascular complications. Some of these studies also indicate superiority of ARBs compared to other antihypertensives with respect to particular cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and metabolic complications. Taken together, it is justified to classify ARBs as first-line medication for hypertensive patients in general as well as for patients at high cardiovascular risk in particular. Consequently, ARBs have been integrated into the respective treatment guidelines of all leading international organizations. This monograph is intended to offer state-of-the-art knowledge concerning ARBs and, especially, their application in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. After a general introduction into the RAS and the pharmacology of ARBs, the focus turns to the rationale of their application under different pathophysiological conditions, such as hypertension, chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and diabetes, with particular emphasis on the state of evidence deduced from clinical trials.
Table of contents
Foreword
In the last three decades, the evolution in the field of medical management of cardiovascular diseases has been absolutely impressive. The transition from an almost empiric approach to a pathophysiological strategy has characterized the new era of pharmacological treatment of most cardiovascular clinical conditions. In addition, the efficacy of modern drug treatment must be based on solid, unequivocal proofs deriving from large, rigorous studies (evidence-based medicine).
For any new class of cardiovascular drugs, rational, sound mechanism of action and indisputable safety and efficacy of major clinical end points, particularly reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, represent necessary requirements. As such, angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists, or blockers (ARBs), are a paradigm of drug therapy of modern times.
In order to fulfill all the new criteria for cardiovascular drugs, the ARBs have been extensively, almost frantically, investigated. Being extremely interesting considering their rational mechanism of action, that is, the selective antagonism of angiotensin AT1 receptors - the main biological effector of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) - the ARBs have been rigorously studied and tested in thousands of experimental and clinical investigations. Most recently, in view of the key pathophysiological role of the RAS in cardiovascular disease, the scientific medical community has focused on the potential advantages of ARBs in high-risk patients, the most rational target for preventive strategies.
The enormous, growing size, complexity, and, sometimes, discrepancies of the scientific literature on this topic, however, represent a tough challenge for all physicians who every day use ARBs in their practice. Undoubtedly, expert reviews of the available data and reports are very useful. The excellent work of Jan Schefe and Thomas Unger in this monograph provides a real state-of-the-art review of the scientific knowledge of ARBs, with a specific focus on their use in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.
This text provides the essential notions on the biology, structural organization, physiology, and pathophysiology of the RAS, with a specific focus on the modern view of the network of angiotensin receptors, to which field the research groups led by Professor Unger have given important scientific contributions. In addition, the pharmacology of ARBs and the differences among the various compounds available today are presented synthetically to introduce the clinical applications of this new class of drugs. The broad range of clinical conditions in which ARBs have been tested is discussed extensively in well-organized separate sections and in a balanced way that I am sure will be much appreciated by the readers. Finally, the authors open a window on future studies that will definitely have a major impact on the clinical use of ARBs.
Overall, this work represents an extremely updated, knowledgeable, and balanced state-of-the-art review of this important new class of cardiovascular drugs and of the tremendous amount of information accumulated in this area in the last few years. I am quite confident that many colleagues will find this work very useful for updating their knowledge and driving their clinical practice.
ARTICLES
Angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events: the state of the art
Jan H. Schefe, Thomas Unger
|
 |
|
 |
| |
Editors-in-chief
Christopher P. Cannon - MD Sergio Dalla Volta - MD, PhD
While cardiology over the last 15 years has progressed to a great extent in various aspects, it has not progressed in a harmonious manner. Advances in biophysics, molecular biology, genetics, and, les...
Past editor-in-chief
Philip A. Poole-Wilson - MD, FRCP, FACC, FESC, FMedSci
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|